000			10035camIa2200493 i 4500
006			m d
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			120102s2011 xx of 000 0 eng d
020			_a9781119968436 _qelectronic bk.
020			_a1119968437 _qelectronic bk.
035			_a(OCoLC)
040			_aBAUN _beng _cBAUN _erda
049			_aBAUN_MERKEZ
050	0	4	_aNA9053.H76 _bE54 2012
100	1		_aMallory-Hill, Shauna.
245	1	0	_aEnhancing Building Performance _h[electronic resource] / _cedited by Shauna Mallory-Hill, Wolfgang Preiser, Chris Watson.
250			_a2nd ed.
264			_aHoboken : _bJohn Wiley & Sons, _c2011.
300			_a1 online resource (362 pages)
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _acomputer _bc
338			_2rdacarrier _aonline resource _bnc
347			_adata file _2rda
380			_aHandbook
500			_a10.3 A framework for evaluating interactive adaptability.
505	0	0	_tContents _tContributors _tPreface _tAcknowledgements _tForeword _tI Introduction: Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) Process Model _t1 Introduction to Building Performance Evaluation: Milestones in Evolution _t1.1 Enhancing building performance _t1.2 Emergence of person-environment research _t1.3 Maturation of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (1975–1985) _t1.4 POE as a distinct discipline (1985–1995) _t1.5 Feeding forward: from POE to BPE (1995–2005) _t1.6 Ongoing global efforts in BPE (2005 +) _t1.7 Conclusion _tReferences _tFurther reading _t2 A Process Model for Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) _t2.1 Introduction _t2.2 Description of the process model for BPE _t2.3 The performance concept and the building process _t2.4 Conclusion _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _tII Design Processes and Evaluation _t3 The Integrative Design Process _t3.1 Introduction _t3.2 Origin, evolution and definitions of IDP _t3.3 Highlights of others’ work: systems thinking in IDP and a unitive process _t3.4 The means to motivation: engaging clients in sustainability prior to IDP _t3.5 The integrative regulatory process _t3.6 Conclusion _tReferences _t4 Participatory/Collaborative Design Process _t4.1 Introduction _t4.2 Background _t4.3 Community participation _t4.4 Conclusion _tReferences _tFurther reading _t5 Enhancing Design Programming: The Case of Detroit Collaborative Design Center and Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation _t5.1 Introduction _t5.2 Participatory design process and intent _t5.3 Enhancing the process _t5.4 Conclusions _tReferences _t6 Patterns in Post-Occupancy Evaluation _t6.1 Introduction _t6.2 Principles _t6.3 Communities of interest _t6.4 Process _t6.5 Evaluating environmental impact _t6.6 Pattern language format _t6.7 Recurring findings _t6.8 Communicating stakeholders’ experience of architecture _t6.9 Conclusion _tReferences _tIII Case Studies _t7 The Changing Meaning of Workspace: Planning Space and Technology in the Work Environment _t7.1 Introduction _t7.2 The ‘X’ organization – building for the future _t7.3 Involving users for better workspace design _t7.4 Building and workspace outcomes _t7.5 Conclusion _tReferences _t8 Programming Spaces for Innovation _t8.1 Introduction _t8.2 Spaces for innovation _t8.3 Understanding requirements _t8.4 Analysis methods _t8.5 Key requirements for innovation spaces _t8.6 Conclusion _tReferences _t9 Assessing Building Performance for Local Government Offices in Japan _t9.1 Introduction _t9.2 Organizational development of the Mie Prefecture Government office _t9.3 Example of office layout changes _t9.4 Work style classification studies _t9.5 Analysis of worker activities _t9.6 Analysis of work style classifications _t9.7 Analysis of workers’ collaboration activities _t9.8 Relationships among work communication activities _t9.9 Conclusions _tReferences _t10 Developing Occupancy Feedback to Improve Low Carbon Housing _t10.1 Introduction _t10.2 Background _t10.3 A framework for evaluating interactive adaptability _t10.4 Low carbon home case study _t10.5 Where next? _t10.6 Conclusions _tAcknowledgement _tReferences _t11 Evaluating Federal Workplaces in the US: The Case of the General Services Administration _t11.1 Introduction _t11.2 Background _t11.3 Survey results _t11.4 Reflections on ‘efficiency’ and ‘expression’ _t11.5 Re-deploying the survey to measure post-occupancy success _t11.6 Conclusion _tReferences _t12 Assessing Qatar University’s Campus Outdoor Spaces: Design Intentions Versus Users’ Reactions _t12.1 Introduction _t12.2 Overview of the literature on campus outdoor spaces _t12.3 Campus features – architect’s statements _t12.4 Assessing outdoor spaces: a multilayered methodology _t12.5 Key findings _t12.6 Conclusion _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _t13 Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) and the Role of Perceived Values in Heritage Preservation – A Research Case for Italy _t13.1 Introduction _t13.2 Background _t13.3 A performance-based approach for sustainable reuse _t13.4 Counseling for communities: a performance-based approach at different scales _t13.5 Conclusions _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _tIV Research Methods and Tools _t14 Evaluating the Impact of Green Building on Worker Productivity and Health: A Literature Review _t14.1 Introduction _t14.2 Background _t14.3 Literature review method _t14.4 Performance indicators and data collection techniques _t14.5 Conclusions _tReferences _t15 Quantitative (GIS) and Qualitative (BPE) Assessments of Library Performance _t15.1 Introduction _t15.2 Background _t15.3 Project design and methodology _t15.4 Results _t15.5 Recommendations _t15.6 Conclusion _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _tFurther reading _t16 Applying MAPLE/D and BPE to Complex Building Types _t16.1 Introduction _t16.2 Background: the meta-method MAPLE/D _t16.3 Example: POE of a large-scale laboratory building complex _t16.4 Links between BPE and MAPLE/D _t16.5 Conclusion _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _t17 Stimulating Physically Active Behavior Through Good Building Design _t17.1 Introduction _t17.2 The active imperative _t17.3 Servicescapes _t17.4 Layering of built environment solutions _t17.5 Evaluating the capacity of buildings to encourage physically active behavior _t17.6 Conclusion _tReferences _t18 Evidence-Based Decision-Making on Office Accommodation: Accommodation Choice Model _t18.1 Introduction _t18.2 Modeling accommodation processes _t18.3 Elaboration of the model _t18.4 Justification of the accommodation choice model _t18.5 Application in practice _t18.6 Conclusion _tReferences _t19 Evaluation Through Computational Building Performance Simulation _t19.1 Introduction _t19.2 Background _t19.3 Building performance simulation _t19.4 State-of-the-art _t19.5 Quality assurance of simulation based decisions _t19.6 Conclusion _tReferences _tFurther reading _t20 Incorporating Occupant Perceptions and Behavior into BIM _t20.1 Introduction _t20.2 BIM and the design process _t20.3 Linking BPE and BIM _t20.4 Simulating behavior _t20.5 Metrics _t20.6 Illustrative simulation model _t20.7 Conclusions: implications for emerging practice _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _tV Education _t21 Post-Occupancy Evaluation in Brazil: Its Impact on Professional Practice _t21.1 Introduction _t21.2 POE methodology _t21.3 Case studies _t21.4 Conclusions _tReferences _t22 Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) in the Construction Project Management Curriculum _t22.1 Introduction _t22.2 The school and its programs _t22.3 BPE in the curriculum _t22.4 Outline of selected lectures and seminars _t22.5 Employment opportunities _t22.6 Conclusions _tReferences _t23 Evaluation Research and Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) in Architecture and Urbanism: Consumption Versus Production of Knowledge _t23.1 Introduction _t23.2 Idiosyncrasies on knowledge delivery and acquisition _t23.3 Evaluation research and inquiry based learning (IBL) _t23.4 Evaluation research: a paradigm for utilizing the built environment as an open textbook _t23.5 Conclusion: Evaluation research and seeking a new form of pedagogy _tReferences _t24 Post Tower Evaluation: User-Needs Analysis (UNA) in German Student Education _t24.1 Introduction _t24.2 Background _t24.3 Prelminary studies _t24.4 Stakeholder questionnaire _t24.5 Data collection – the walkthrough _t24.6 Results _t24.7 Conclusions _tAcknowledgements _tReferences _t25 Ethnographic Methods in Support of Architectural Practice _t25.1 Introduction _t25.2 The nature of the student research is ethnographic _t25.3 Two kinds of findings _t25.4 Benefits of student research projects _t25.5 Conclusion _tEndnotes _tReferences _tFurther reading _tVI Epilogue _t26 Reflections on Stage M: The Dog that Didn’t Bark _t26.1 Introduction _t26.2 Background _t26.3 Stage M feedback on meeting client objectives _t26.4 Conclusions _tEndnotes _tReferences _tIndex
520			_a"Enhancing Building Performance presents the latest BPE work, providing a systematic approach for those who wish to use BPE to deliver improved building performance that is responsive to the needs of stakeholders. With chapters written by experts from around the world the book demonstrates how to apply BPE to enhance building design. Topics covered include: evidence-based and integrative design processes, evaluation methods and tools, and education and knowledge transfer. In addition, case studies provide specific examples of how BPE has been used to study such things as the impact of workplace design on human productivity and innovation"--Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aBuilding _vHandbooks, manuals, etc. _921261
650		0	_aBuilding performance evaluation.
650		0	_aBuildings _xPerformance.
650		0	_aStandards, Engineering _vHandbooks, manuals, etc.
650		0	_aEngineering _91049
650		0	_aArchitecture _xHuman factors _918215
650		0	_aArchitectural design _xEvaluation.
650		0	_aBuildings _xEvaluation.
650		0	_aBuildings _xPerformance.
650		0	_aOffice layout _xPsychological aspects.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
700	1		_aPreiser, Wolfgang P. E.
700	1		_aWatson, Christopher G.
856	4	0	_uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=509633
900			_aEK414
942			_2lcc _cEKT
999			_c31642 _d31642