000			03761nam a2200301 i 4500
001			45405
008			170905s2017 enkm 0 eng d
020			_a9780128139714 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a0128139714 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9780128139707 _q(paperback)
035			_a(OCoLC)
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dOPELS _dIDEBK _dEBLCP _dN$T _dBAUN
049			_aBAUN_MERKEZ
050		4	_aTH1715 _b.S73 2017
082	0	4	_223
100	1		_aStazi, Francesca.
245	1	0	_aThermal inertia in energy efficient building envelopes / _cFrancesca Stazi.
264		1	_aOxford, United Kingdom : _bButterworth-Heinemann, an imprint of Elsevier, _c2017.
300			_axv, 358 pages : _billustrations ; _c22 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
500			_aIncludes index.
505	0	0	_tBiography _tPreface _tAcknowledgments _tSymbols, Units, and Conventions _t1. High Thermal Resistance Versus High Thermal Capacity: The Dilemma _t1.1 Introduction _t1.2 Background _t1.2.1 The optimal envelope identification is still a challenge _t1.2.2 Comfort issues _t1.2.3 Environmental issues and global costs _t1.3 The Need to Restore the Dynamic Behavior of the Envelope _t1.4 What Is New... _tReferences _t2. The Envelope: A Complex and Dynamic Problem _t2.1 Introduction _t2.2 Relevant Parameters. _t2.2.1 Problem description2.2.2 Dynamic thermal characteristics of the building envelope _t2.2.3 The internal areal heat capacity _t2.2.4 Effect of the internal heat capacity on summer performance _t2.2.5 The dampening attitude _t2.2.6 Effect of the dampening attitude on summer performance _t2.2.7 Improving the worst solution W6 _t2.2.8 Dynamic parameters affecting the winter consumptions _t2.2.9 A proposal for superinsulated envelopes in temperate climates _t2.3 Impact of Thermal Capacity in Different Design Conditions _t2.3.1 Problem description _t2.3.2 Skin dominated versus core dominated. _t2.3.3 Shaded versus unshaded2.3.4 Continuously used versus intermittently used _t2.3.5 Ventilated versus unventilated _t2.4 The Importance of the Occupants' Behavior _t2.4.1 Problem description _t2.4.2 Occupants' behavior on the use of the heating plants _t2.4.3 Different use of natural ventilation and envelope air permeability _t2.4.4 Global convenience of an intervention of superinsulation _t2.5 The Complex Interaction Between Mass and Other Factors _t2.5.1 Problem description _t2.5.2 Trend inversion _t2.5.3 Impact of the mass with and without natural ventilation. _t2.5.4 Impact of the presence of other heat losing elements2.5.5 Effect of superinsulation in envelopes with different mass _t2.6 Thermal Mass and Extreme Climates _t2.6.1 Problem description _t2.6.2 Extremely hot climates _t2.6.3 Cold climates _t2.7 Design Patterns _tReferences _t3. Retrofit of Existing Envelopes _t3.1 Introduction _t3.2 Capacity (C), Stratification (S), and High Resistance (HR): Three Different Ways Against Climate _t3.3 Simultaneous Measure of the Three Different Existing Envelope Typologies _t3.3.1 Problem description _t3.3.2 Summer behavior _t3.3.3 Winter behavior. _t3.4 Retrofit of Capacitive Load-Bearing Walls, Exploring Different C Types3.4.1 Problem description _t3.4.2 Solid masonry four-wythe C1 _t3.4.3 Solid masonry three-wythe C2 _t3.4.4 Semisolid masonry C3 _t3.4.5 Optimal retrofit intervention from a global cost evaluation _t3.5 Retrofit of Stratified Envelopes, Comparing Alternatives for Retrofit of S Types _t3.5.1 Problem description _t3.5.2 Medium decrementing attitude (0.0440) and variable decrementing attitude _t3.5.4 Optimal retrofit intervention from an overall comfort evaluation.
650		0	_aInsulation (Heat)
650		0	_aBuildings _xEnvironmental engineering.
942			_2lcc _cKT
999			_c46393 _d46393